KC Green, the cartoonist behind the 'This is fine' burning-dog meme, says AI startup Artisan put his artwork on a subway ad without his permission and is now looking for a lawyer. Green flagged the ad in a Bluesky post on May 3, 2026, after followers sent him photos of a station placard featuring his smiling dog, the flames, and a new caption reading 'my pipeline is on fire' next to a pitch to 'Hire Ava the AI BDR.' The comic first appeared in Green's webcomic Gunshow in 2013, making it 13 years old and one of the most-reproduced memes on the internet.
'i've been getting more folks telling me about this and it's not anything i agreed to,' Green wrote. 'it's been stolen like AI steals. please vandalize it if and when you see it.' He told TechCrunch by email that he is 'looking into [legal] representation, as I feel I have to.'
Artisan, asked about the ad, said, 'We have a lot of respect for KC Green and his work, and we're reaching out to him directly.' In a follow-up, the company said it had scheduled time to speak with him. It did not say whether the ad would be pulled in the meantime, or whether Green would be paid.
Key facts
- 01KC Green says AI startup Artisan used his 'This is fine' comic in a subway ad for 'Ava the AI BDR' without his permission.
- 02Green posted the complaint to Bluesky on May 3, 2026, telling followers to 'please vandalize it if and when you see it.'
- 03Artisan told TechCrunch it has 'a lot of respect for KC Green' and has scheduled time to speak with him directly.
- 04The comic first appeared in Green's webcomic Gunshow in 2013 and has since become one of the most-circulated memes online.
- 05Green said he is 'looking into legal representation,' echoing Matt Furie's earlier suit against Infowars over Pepe the Frog.
This is not Artisan's first run-in with public backlash over its marketing. The company previously bought billboards telling businesses to 'Stop hiring humans,' a campaign founder and CEO Jaspar Carmichael-Jack defended by arguing the message was about 'a category of work,' not 'humans at large.' The Ava the AI BDR product is the same pitch dressed for the subway: replace your sales development reps with software.
“Green said the ad has 'been stolen like AI steals' and urged followers to vandalize it on sight, 13 years after the comic first ran in Gunshow in 2013.”— Jaeden Schafer
What's different this time is the source material. 'This is fine' is not generic stock art. It is a specific panel from a specific comic by a specific working cartoonist, and Green has spent more than a decade watching it spread without his sign-off. He has not fully disavowed the dog — he recently turned the comic into a game — but he has been clear that commercial reuse is a different question from meme circulation.
The closest legal precedent is Matt Furie, creator of Pepe the Frog, who sued Infowars after the site sold a poster featuring his character. That case eventually settled. Furie's suit established, at minimum, that meme ubiquity does not strip an artist of the right to control commercial use of the underlying drawing.
Green's frustration in the TechCrunch exchange was less about the ad itself than about the cost of fighting it. He said the situation 'takes the wind out of my sails' because he now has to spend 'time out of my life to try my hand at the American court system instead of putting that back into what I am passionate about, which is drawing comics and stories.' He added: 'These no-thought A.I. losers aren't untouchable and memes just don't come out of thin air.'
The dispute lands in a year already crowded with copyright fights over how AI companies source training data and marketing imagery. Most of those cases involve model training — whether scraping copyrighted work to train a model is fair use. The Artisan ad is a simpler question: whether a startup can paste a recognizable copyrighted panel onto a paid placement and call it a campaign. The answer, under existing law, is generally no, regardless of how the image was generated or sourced.
Artisan has not said whether the artwork in the ad was generated by a model, traced, or simply lifted. That distinction may matter to the company's defense; it does not change Green's underlying claim, which rests on the original 2013 panel.
Green's case is small relative to the suits working through courts against OpenAI, Anthropic, and other model builders, and he does not have the legal budget of a publisher or a record label. That is the point. If a single cartoonist with a Bluesky account and a gut sense that he has been ripped off can force an AI startup to the table — or to a courtroom — it raises the cost of the casual creative theft that has so far been treated as a marketing externality. The 'This is fine' dog has spent 13 years sitting in the flames. The artist who drew him would prefer to be paid before his work is used to sell software that replaces other working people.
Working on something we should cover, or seeing a story we missed? Send leads, documents, or feedback to hello@aichatdaily.com. For sensitive tips, see our secure tips page for Signal and PGP options.
Spotted an error? Email hello@aichatdaily.com with the URL and the issue, or read our full corrections policy.
