Skip to main content
Live
Main content
Review · Transcription
Whisper logo

Whisper

Editor rating
4.6/ 5
Starting price
$0
Free tier
Yes
Platforms
ApiLocalWeb
Developer
OpenAI
Launched
2022

Whisper review

4.6 / 5By OpenAIResearched overview by AI Chat DailyUpdated Visit official site ↗
The verdict

Whisper is still the baseline for AI transcription in 2026 — open-weights, multilingual, and a sub-$0.01 per minute API. Most modern transcription tools either are Whisper, are fine-tuned from Whisper, or have to explain why they're not.

Try WhisperOpens github.com

How this was put together. This is a researched overview, not a hands-on review — compiled by the AI Chat Daily desk from Whisper's own documentation, pricing pages and release notes, plus how the product has been received. The score reflects documented capability and market position rather than our own testing. Last checked May 4, 2026. No sponsorship, no affiliate relationship. Read our editorial standards and corrections policy.

Whisper is one of those releases that quietly defined an entire category. Before September 2022, speech-to-text was a fragmented market — Google Cloud Speech, AWS Transcribe, Otter, Trint, Rev, Otter again, all with different accuracy profiles, different language support, and different pricing models. After Whisper, almost everything in the category became "Whisper, plus our wrapper" or "we trained from Whisper."

The good
  • Open weights — runs locally on a Mac mini or modest GPU
  • 99-language support, with strong English and major-language coverage
  • API is among the cheapest in the category
  • Outputs verbatim or smoothed; supports word-level timestamps
  • Massive ecosystem of fine-tunes, wrappers, and hosting providers
Watch out
  • Hallucinates on silent audio — invents content that wasn't there
  • Large-v3 is the latest; OpenAI hasn't released a v4 yet
  • Diarization (who-said-what) requires a second model on top
  • Real-time streaming requires a third-party wrapper, not native
Best for
  • Developers building transcription into their own apps
  • Teams self-hosting for privacy or cost reasons
  • Multilingual workflows where one model has to handle many languages
  • Anyone needing word-level timestamps for caption rendering
Avoid if
  • You need diarization out of the box (use Otter, Descript, AssemblyAI)
  • You want a polished consumer interface (use Whisper-derivatives instead)
  • You need real-time streaming with native API support

Pricing

Self-host (open weights)
$0

Run locally on CPU or GPU. Apache 2.0 license.

OpenAI API
$0.006/min

Hosted Whisper-large-v3 via OpenAI's audio.transcriptions endpoint.

Best value
Hosted alternatives
varies

Replicate, Together, Groq all host Whisper at competitive prices.

What it is

Whisper is a transformer-based encoder-decoder model trained on 680,000 hours of multilingual, multitask supervised data scraped from the web. OpenAI released the weights under an Apache 2.0 license, which means anyone can run it, fine-tune it, or build a product on it without paying OpenAI anything.

The model comes in five sizes — tiny (39M parameters), base (74M), small (244M), medium (769M), large (1.5B). Larger models are slower but more accurate. The current release is large-v3, which dropped late 2023 and is still the public-weights state of the art. OpenAI's API serves a model branded "whisper-1" that's at minimum equivalent to large-v3, possibly better — they haven't said.

Why it dominated

Three reasons: it was free, it was good, and it shipped with code that ran on a laptop. The combination meant that every team in 2023 with a transcription problem tried Whisper before they tried anything paid. Most of them stopped looking after that. The category's commercial vendors — Otter, Descript, Rev — pivoted to building features on top of Whisper rather than competing with the underlying transcription quality.

The API followed in 2023 at $0.006 per minute, which is roughly an order of magnitude cheaper than the previous incumbents. That priced out the standalone-API category and forced consolidation around either (a) self-hosting, (b) OpenAI's hosted Whisper, or (c) a hosting provider like Replicate or Together that wraps Whisper at similar margins.

Where it falls short

Hallucinations on silent audio. This is the most-commented-on weakness — feed Whisper a 30-second segment of near-silence and it will sometimes generate a plausible sentence that isn't there. The fix is voice-activity-detection (VAD) preprocessing: skip the silent parts before sending audio to Whisper. Most production wrappers do this; the raw model doesn't.

No native diarization. Whisper transcribes; it doesn't separate speakers. The standard pattern is Whisper plus pyannote.audio for diarization, run as two passes and merged at the timestamp level. This is the difference between Whisper and a finished consumer product like Otter — Otter does the merge for you.

No native streaming. Whisper is a chunked-input model: feed it a 30-second window, get back a transcription. Real-time streaming wrappers exist (whisper.cpp, faster-whisper) but the streaming isn't part of the model architecture; latency on long-form live audio is bounded by the chunk window.

Verdict

Whisper is the default, the baseline, and the thing every other transcription tool has to differentiate against. Self-host it for privacy or scale, use the API for everything else. If you want a polished consumer experience with diarization and meeting summaries, look at Whisper-derivatives like Otter or TurboScribe — but know that the underlying transcription is still Whisper.

Frequently asked questions

What is Whisper?
Whisper is an open-weights speech-to-text model OpenAI released in September 2022. It comes in several sizes (tiny, base, small, medium, large) and supports 99 languages including transcription and translation to English.
Should I self-host or use the API?
API ($0.006/min) is cheaper than hosting unless you're transcribing many thousand hours per month. Self-hosting wins on privacy (audio never leaves your hardware) and on offline use. Mac mini M2 with 16GB RAM runs Whisper-large at roughly 1× real-time.
Why does it hallucinate?
Whisper occasionally generates plausible-sounding text from silent or near-silent audio segments — a known training artifact. Mitigations include voice-activity-detection pre-processing (only feed Whisper segments where someone is actually speaking) and confidence-based filtering.
Does it do speaker diarization?
Not natively. The standard pattern is Whisper for transcription + pyannote.audio for diarization, run as two passes. Otter and Descript handle this for you; they're both Whisper-plus-pyannote under the hood plus their own polish.
Is there a Whisper v4?
Not as of 2026-05. Whisper-large-v3 (released late 2023) is still the current open release. OpenAI's hosted product has had quality improvements that may or may not reflect a newer model on the back end; they haven't published anything.
Can it run on a phone?
Whisper-tiny and Whisper-base run on iPhone via WhisperKit and similar wrappers. The accuracy is lower than the medium/large variants but adequate for note-taking.
Explore further
AI Box Daily briefingFree · Daily · No fluff

Stay ahead of everyone in AI.

The tightly edited AI news email engineers, founders, and investors actually open. One email. Every weekday. Five minutes to finish.

Loved by 10,000+ AI professionals
Free forever. Unsubscribe with one click.

The briefing read inside teams at

Keep reading

More on Whisper

Meetily ships a free, local meeting transcriber that skips the cloud
Tools

Meetily ships a free, local meeting transcriber that skips the cloud

The open-source app records and summarizes Zoom, Meet, and Teams calls on-device, undercutting the $10–$20/month meeting-assistant tier.

Jaeden Schafer4 min read